Premarital Cohabitation

I almost never post about my wedding on this blog, mostly because Kim Kardashian and Mark Wahlberg and guys named "Wiener" keep doing dumb enough stuff to keep me otherwise occupied.  But, in order to be considered legally married in this country, a young bride is required to show proof that she has read at least 2,000 wedding blogs, etiquette books, shallow advice columns, and intimidating do-it-yourself project guides (DIYs!!!!!!) that make you feel like your inability to conjure a creative use for recycled organic burlap sacks as centerpieces just goes to prove you never deserved that ring in the first place.

I love stock photos!
Personal bridal bitterness aside, while reading my requisite "perfect wedding" blogs (and the conspicuously less ubiquitous "successful happy marriage" blogs), I keep stumbling across one particular subject of heated controversy: the issue of pre-marital cohabitation.  If you're a woman in her 20s, married or not, you have probably had numerous conversations with your female friends over the benefits and detriments of living together before marriage.  And,  remarkably, cohabitation is an extremely polarizing, almost political issue.  The discussion is almost never about what our personal, immediate choices are, but whether living together is fundamentally "right" or "wrong" for hypothetical couples everywhere.  Further,  both sides bolster their viewpoints with concepts like "morality" and preface our statements with words like "believe."  ("I just don't believe in living together," we girls will say, as if the fact of two people living together is preposterous and inconceivable.)

I, on many occasions, have been guilty of this behavior.  And to contextualize what I'm about to tell you, I should say that I was always on the "don't believe" end of the absurdly binary spectrum, even before anyone had ever offered or desired to cohabitate with me.  It's true, I didn't "believe" in this practice in the abstract; however, I cannot say with certainty what decision I would actually make as a 27-year-old engaged woman because I have never had the occasion to make that decision.  You see, my fiance and I have lived in different cities for our entire relationship, which will change the week after our wedding, so we never had the opportunity to realistically discuss the choice to "move in together" either before or during our engagement.  So, despite my previously espoused "disbelief" in the concept, the truth is, I don't know what I would've done given the autonomy of choice. 

Disbelievers in premartial cohabitation are not the only ones guilty of asserting the "right" choice though; since getting engaged and explaining my circumstances, I've gotten a barrage of everything from subtle raised eyebrows to the more direct "that's a bad idea, you should really live together first" commentary on my personal life.  Especially because my situation is exacerbated by distance, girlfriends, acquaintances, and strangers have all ventured opinions about how wise or unwise it is to get married without shacking up.  So, this running real-life commentary, combined with reading a bunch of misquoted statistics on wedding blogs prompted this blog post.  I'd like to set the record straight about what the cohabitation studies really say, and talk a little bit about marriage and its potential success -- at least as measured by statistics.

The first major key to understanding the following statistics -- and the core source of most misquotes and misinterpretation -- is the difference between "correlation" and "causality."  These terms may seem rudimentary (and forgive me if they are to you), but they are so often misunderstood in the world of interpreting scientific studies.  For a clear, entertaining, totally readable treatment of this concept, I recommend the book Freakonomics and its sequel SuperFreakonomics, which you can devour entirely on a mid-distance flight and looks way better when brandished in front of your in-flight neighbor than your suspiciously worn copy of 50 Shades of Grey. (I'm so topical, y'all! Finger on the PULSE!) Here's a short video by the authors on the concept if I'm too dry and lame for you:



Reduced to its simplest core, many events can correlate with one another without one necessarily causing the other.

The actual statistics on cohabitation come from this study by the CDC, and what they show is that couples who live together before marriage are indeed more likely to get divorced.  What they do not show is that living together before marriage causes divorce.  Rather, some of the factors that correlate with a couple's likelihood to live together unmarried also correlate with their likelihood to never marry or not stay married.   The factors are annoyingly predictable: education levels, race, family history of marriage, age of first marriage, timing of first childbirth, importance of religion, etc.  All of these factors are discussed in depth (with charts and everything!) in the study.  (It's surprisingly readable if you're interested.)

But what the study says about cohabitation is this:
"Previous cohabitation experience was significantly associated with marriage survival probabilities for men. In general, men who cohabited prior to their first marriage had lower probabilities of the marriage surviving to the 10th anniversary than those who did not cohabit prior to their first marriage."
However, if a couple was engaged at the time they cohabitated, the statistics on marriage success were nearly identical to couples who never cohabitated before marriage. (The New York Times also did a piece on this.)  "The likelihood that a marriage would last 10 years was 71% for men who were engaged at cohabitation and 69% for men who had never cohabited before their first marriage." Women had similar statistics.

So, it's true that people who are more likely to live together before marriage have a lower chance, statistically, of being married in 10 years.  But it's also true that people who live together before marriage are less likely to get married at all.  And, it's also true that, though there is a correlation between premarital cohabitation and 10 year divorce rates, there's a larger correlation between other factors and divorce:
 "While there was a 9% difference in the ten-year divorce rate between couples who cohabited and those who didn't, the difference was 30% by family income (couples with an income of $50,000 or more are much less likely to get divorced), 24% by age at marriage (women who marry when they're 25 or older are less likely to divorce), 14% by religion (religious women are less likely to divorce), and 13% by education (women with education beyond high school are less likely to divorce)." (Source: unmarried.org)
One thing is for sure, more people are doing it.  This comprehensive study is a decade old now, and who knows how the numbers might have changed, but the basic principles -- especially as far as age, education, and delaying childbirth are concerned -- likely still hold true (not least because these three factors also influence the big marriage divider: household income).  My basic, imploring point, though, is aimed at all you wedding blog commentators: don't use statistics to bolster moral arguments unless you're sure you understand what the statistics are saying.  Moving in together won't make you get a divorce, just as putting a ring on it before you live in the same house won't make you stay married forever.  But having an intelligent and respectful conversation about marriage rates in our country? That's hot.  Hot like biscuits.  Dance biscuits.



Oh and P.S.: I'm getting married on Saturday.  'Til then, Boomstickers!
Previous
Next Post »

4 comments

Write comments
Amy Saxon
AUTHOR
June 19, 2012 at 8:11 PM delete

I love you :)
AND I cannot wait to see you get hitched.
mwah! -Amy

Reply
avatar
Ashley Thomas
AUTHOR
June 19, 2012 at 9:37 PM delete

Well said girl :) Cannot wait for the wedding this weekend - I know it is going to be amazing!

Reply
avatar
meghan
AUTHOR
June 20, 2012 at 9:05 PM delete

Interesting post. Thanks for sharing. I'm so excited for you. I can't wait to see pictures, and I'm sorry we won't be there!! Have the best time!

Reply
avatar
Scott
AUTHOR
June 21, 2012 at 10:00 AM delete

*as if the fact of two people living together WERE preposterous and inconceivable.

Boom.

Reply
avatar

© 2015 by Alison

All of the writing on this site, unless otherwise indicated, is original and is exclusively the property of Alison. Most of the images on this site, however, are not owned by Alison. They are largely a product of a Google Image Search and intended to make viewing this site less boring. If any of the images used on this site belong to you and you would like a credit or removal, please contact me at alisonsboomstick@gmail.com.